|
Roundup of Links from M Street Meeting |
|
Written by Charles Allen
|
|
Wednesday, 10 March 2010 |
|
Less than a few hours after last night’s M Street SE / SW meeting had ended, blog posts were popping up all over the place with recaps of the discussion
In case you missed it, last night Tommy hosted a meeting to talk about several possible traffic calming and pedestrian improvements to M Street SE & SW through what’s known as a “complete street.” A complete street looks to reduce the number and speed of cars on the roadways, provide better pedestrian safety and access, and support alternate means of travel that connects neighborhoods. AARP, a strong supporter of the concept, presented information about why a complete street is good for both older and younger residents. Tommy outlined how over the next few years, the M Street SE & SW corridor will witness billions of dollars of development, a growth in 25,000 employees and 10,000 new residents. That’s equivalent to building a new small American city, and M Street will be the new main street. We can either plan now to have it serve the community’s needs, or end up with even more of a raceway that divides the neighborhood. Currently, M Street is a 6-lane highway – plunked down in the middle of one of the most multi-modal neighborhoods in the city. Within blocks you can not only find major roadways, but you can ride Metrorail, Metrobus, or the Circulator, as well as catch a water taxi or even use the helipad. But M Street does not serve the needs for pedestrians and cyclists, instead, catering to the 1950's and 60's model of trying to move as many cars as possible through an area. A complete street is a different way to think about a street -- one that slows cars down, provides better pedestrian crossings and walking experience, and supports alternative modes of transportation. Here are few links to write-ups from the meeting: JDLand: Click Here SWDC Blog: Click Here WashCycle: Click Here Link to Tommy's slides: Click Here | | This item includes 6 comments |
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 10 March 2010 )
|
|
|
Real Property Taxes in 2010 |
|
Written by Linda O'Brien
|
|
Tuesday, 09 March 2010 |
|
At this point, most of us have received our property tax assessments from the Office of Tax and Revenue (OTR). Let's face it, no way you slice it, not very many people enjoy paying taxes. For some though, there will be increases that may catch you by surprise and for others there may be slight decreases that also may come as a surprise. We’ve received several phone calls and emails with one question – Why? For those with a decrease, it is due to two factors – falling assessments and the Council’s cap of a yearly 10% increase in real property’s taxable assessment. OTR has informed us that this year assessments are down an average of 5% on single family homes and more than 10% on commercial properties. With a lower assessment comes a lower tax bill. For those whose assessment has risen, the legislation enacted by the Council at the height of the sales boom that restricts real property taxation to no more than a 10% increase in the property’s taxable assessment each year, will afford some residents slightly lower real property taxes. But not all residential properties will see a decrease, and those that do, may only see a slight decrease.
For those with an increase, the answer requires a bit more information. Many homes have typically enjoyed low tax bills over the last many years, and this year’s increase may be dramatic. Generally the less you have paid in the past, the more striking the increase will feel to you. This is due to a provision in the Mayor’s FY2010 budget that created a 40% floor on all residential property taxes. With this change, homeowners who have historically paid on only a smaller percentage of the assessed value of their homes -- enjoying lower than normal tax bills for many years -- will now be required to pay taxes on at least 40% of the value of their homes. For example, if a homeowner last year only paid on 15% of their assessed value, their tax bill this year will represent a sharp increase to what they paid last year, now at 40% of the value of their properties. By comparison, most homeowners will continue to pay taxes on 60% of the assessed value as they always have. So even with the increase to a 40% floor, those taxes will be lower than the general population.
Most of us, nonetheless, will continue to feel the pinch as the city continues to struggle with financial decisions in these tough economic times and faces a several hundred million dollar shortfall in the budget. Our office is happy to provide more information and details, as well as help work with the Office of Tax and Revenue if you would like to explore one of the city’s several tax deferral programs. Please call, 724-8072, or email me at
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
, and I will be happy to work with you. | | This item includes 2 comments |
|
|